Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/3310
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Alternate Law Forum | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-09-27T08:43:23Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-09-27T08:43:23Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018-01-16 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/3310 | - |
dc.description | Union argued that the workers were working as much as regular employees and eligible for regularization of their services. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Union rejected management's objections and demanded that the workers' service should be regularised and issue was discussed in conciliation. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.subject | Conciliation Proceeding | en_US |
dc.subject | Regularization of Employment | en_US |
dc.title | Rejoinder by the Union after Avery Dennison's Reply before the Deputy Labour Commissioner | en_US |
dc.type | Rejoinder | en_US |
dc.description.host | Archives of Indian Labour [V.V. Giri National Labour Institute (VVGNLI) - Association of Indian Labour Historians (AILH)] | en_US |
dc.description.dis | “All content hosted in this archive has been obtained with prior permission and approval from the institutions, organisations, and individuals who have either published/produced or held these materials as part of their collections. These materials are meant for educational, research and for non-commercial use only.” | en_US |
dc.page | 4 | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Case 16: Avery Denison - Termination |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rejoinder_by_the_Union_after_Avery_Dennison_Reply_before_the_Deputy_Labour_Commissioner.pdf | 1.44 MB | Adobe PDF | Preview PDFDownload |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.