<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/3307" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/3307</id>
  <updated>2026-04-22T12:55:12Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-22T12:55:12Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Minutes of Conciliation Meeting</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/3315" />
    <author>
      <name>Alternate Law Forum</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/3315</id>
    <updated>2022-11-16T18:42:18Z</updated>
    <published>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Minutes of Conciliation Meeting
Authors: Alternate Law Forum
Abstract: Details of the Dispute.
Description: Details of the Dispute.</summary>
    <dc:date>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Statement of Objections from Sri Udyog Enterprise for Garment and Textile Workers Union</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/3312" />
    <author>
      <name>Alternate Law Forum</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/3312</id>
    <updated>2022-11-16T18:32:28Z</updated>
    <published>2018-03-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Statement of Objections from Sri Udyog Enterprise for Garment and Textile Workers Union
Authors: Alternate Law Forum
Abstract: The management concluded that the union did not provide any evidence for their claim and it should not be forwarded.
Description: There were no claims for Sri Udyog Enterprises and union is not registered. There were no jural relationship of employer and employee.</summary>
    <dc:date>2018-03-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Statement of Objections from Adecco India before the Deputy Labour Commissioner and Conciliation Officer</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/3311" />
    <author>
      <name>Alternate Law Forum</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/3311</id>
    <updated>2022-11-16T18:32:56Z</updated>
    <published>2018-02-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Statement of Objections from Adecco India before the Deputy Labour Commissioner and Conciliation Officer
Authors: Alternate Law Forum
Abstract: They argued that they are responsible for supplying workers and Avery Dennison was responsible for fixing contracts. They denied union's demands.
Description: Wages of the workers were on par with the other establishments of that area. The union could not cite any specific or relevant judgements.</summary>
    <dc:date>2018-02-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rejoinder by the Union after Avery Dennison's Reply before the Deputy Labour Commissioner</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/3310" />
    <author>
      <name>Alternate Law Forum</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/3310</id>
    <updated>2022-11-16T18:40:42Z</updated>
    <published>2018-01-16T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Rejoinder by the Union after Avery Dennison's Reply before the Deputy Labour Commissioner
Authors: Alternate Law Forum
Abstract: Union rejected management's objections and demanded that the workers' service should be regularised and issue was discussed in conciliation.
Description: Union argued that the workers were working as much as regular employees and eligible for regularization of their services.</summary>
    <dc:date>2018-01-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

