<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Case No. 08: Fair Export</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/2980" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/2980</id>
<updated>2026-04-22T20:32:36Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-22T20:32:36Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Karthiban vs Fair Export - Worker's Petition</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/2982" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rights Education and Development Centre</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/2982</id>
<updated>2022-09-09T11:42:35Z</updated>
<published>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Karthiban vs Fair Export - Worker's Petition
Rights Education and Development Centre
Worker's petition against oral termination under the IDA 1947 with the Assistant Labour Commissioner.
Management of Fair Export orally terminated a worker. The worker demanded reinstatement and salary for the terminated period. The management did not respond to the request and the plea was forwarded to the court. In the labour office management denied the petition as the worker was an accountant and not covered under the IDA.
</summary>
<dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Karthiban vs Fair Export-Worker's Petition and Proceeding - Tamil</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/2981" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rights Education and Development Centre</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/2981</id>
<updated>2022-09-09T11:39:07Z</updated>
<published>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Karthiban vs Fair Export-Worker's Petition and Proceeding - Tamil
Rights Education and Development Centre
Worker's petition against oral termination under the IDA 1947 with the Assistant Labour Commissioner.
Management of Fair Export orally terminated a worker. The worker demanded reinstatement and salary for the terminated period. The management did not respond to the request and the plea was forwarded to the court. In the labour office management denied the petition as the worker was an accountant and not covered under the IDA.
</summary>
<dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
