<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/1890">
<title>Builders Association of India’s Documents regarding Tripartite Working Group</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/1890</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/1892"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/1891"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2026-04-22T23:54:01Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/1892">
<title>Document related to Builders' Association of India</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/1892</link>
<description>Document related to Builders' Association of India
Note on Why a Labour Law Like Maharashtra Mathadi Act Not Feasible for Construction Industry? - What is needed for the Construction Industry is a special separate but complete Labour Code.
</description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/1891">
<title>Draft Bill Proposed by the Builders Association of India for Building and Construction Industry Workers</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/1891</link>
<description>Draft Bill Proposed by the Builders Association of India for Building and Construction Industry Workers
Note on the Draft Bill for Building and Construction Industry Workers Circulated by the Builders Association of India.
</description>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
