<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/3307">
<title>Case 16: Avery Denison - Termination</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/3307</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/3315"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/3312"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/3311"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/3310"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2026-04-23T06:24:16Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/3315">
<title>Minutes of Conciliation Meeting</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/3315</link>
<description>Minutes of Conciliation Meeting
Alternate Law Forum
Details of the Dispute.
Details of the Dispute.
</description>
<dc:date>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/3312">
<title>Statement of Objections from Sri Udyog Enterprise for Garment and Textile Workers Union</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/3312</link>
<description>Statement of Objections from Sri Udyog Enterprise for Garment and Textile Workers Union
Alternate Law Forum
The management concluded that the union did not provide any evidence for their claim and it should not be forwarded.
There were no claims for Sri Udyog Enterprises and union is not registered. There were no jural relationship of employer and employee.
</description>
<dc:date>2018-03-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/3311">
<title>Statement of Objections from Adecco India before the Deputy Labour Commissioner and Conciliation Officer</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/3311</link>
<description>Statement of Objections from Adecco India before the Deputy Labour Commissioner and Conciliation Officer
Alternate Law Forum
They argued that they are responsible for supplying workers and Avery Dennison was responsible for fixing contracts. They denied union's demands.
Wages of the workers were on par with the other establishments of that area. The union could not cite any specific or relevant judgements.
</description>
<dc:date>2018-02-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/3310">
<title>Rejoinder by the Union after Avery Dennison's Reply before the Deputy Labour Commissioner</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/3310</link>
<description>Rejoinder by the Union after Avery Dennison's Reply before the Deputy Labour Commissioner
Alternate Law Forum
Union rejected management's objections and demanded that the workers' service should be regularised and issue was discussed in conciliation.
Union argued that the workers were working as much as regular employees and eligible for regularization of their services.
</description>
<dc:date>2018-01-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
