Definition of "INDUSTRY" amplified : Text of Supreme Court Judgement of February 21, 1978

All-India Trade Union Congress

dc.contributor.author	All-India Trade Union Congress
dc.date.accessioned	2020-12-14T08:36:05Z
dc.date.available	2020-12-14T08:36:05Z
dc.date.issued	1978
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/2220
dc.description.abstract	In the Supreme Court of India Civil Appellate Jurisdiction: The Bangalore Water Supply & Sewerage versus A Rejappy & Ors etc, judge Krishna Iyer J. dismisses the water supply and sewerage board appeal. Krishna Iyer J. begins the judgement by noting that there has been great inconsistency in landmark cases in industrial law on what ‘industry’ actually means under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. This situation cannot be allowed to continue, so the term ‘industry’ needs to be clearly defined, something which has actually been exacerbated by the bench: “Legalese and logomachy have the genius to inject mystique into common words.” The judge reviews previous cases in order to clarify the term. Further appeals confirming and extending on Krishna Iyer’s decision are outlined at the end.	en_US
dc.publisher	All-India Trade Union Congress	en_US
dc.title	Definition of "INDUSTRY" amplified : Text of Supreme Court Judgement of February 21, 1978	en_US
dc.type	Pamphlet	en_US
dc.description.host	Archives of Indian Labour [V.V. Giri National Labour Institute (VVGNLI) - Association of Indian Labour Historians (AILH)]
dc.description.dis	"All content hosted in this archive has been obtained with prior permission and approval from the institution, organisation and individuals who have either published/produced or held these materials as part of their collections. These materials are meant for educational, research and for non-commercial use only"
dc.place	Delhi	en_US
dc.page	1-85, 1-10	en_US