Report regarding Representative Character of the All-India Trade Union Congress and the Indian Federation of Labour 1946

Joshi, Sitaram Chintaman

dc.contributor.author	Joshi, Sitaram Chintaman
dc.date.accessioned	2020-12-14T08:58:22Z
dc.date.available	2020-12-14T08:58:22Z
dc.date.issued	1946
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/2234
dc.description.abstract	This interim report was commissioned by order from the Labour Department (No. LC. 28(1), dated 2nd May 1946) to find out whether the All-India Trade Union Congress (AITUC) or the Indian Federation of Labour (IFL) was most representative of workers in India. The most representative organization of workers need to be identified under article 389 of the Treaty of Versailles. It concludes that the AITUC is increasingly becoming more representative from almost every point of view and that Indian Federation of Labour is gradually losing on that score. It also includes state-by-state membership numbers; a note on unions in the mining industry in Bihar.	en_US
dc.publisher	Manager of Publications	en_US
dc.title	Report regarding Representative Character of the All-India Trade Union Congress and the Indian Federation of Labour 1946	en_US
dc.type	Pamphlet	en_US
dc.description.host	Archives of Indian Labour [V.V. Giri National Labour Institute (VVGNLI) - Association of Indian Labour Historians (AILH)]
dc.description.dis	"All content hosted in this archive has been obtained with prior permission and approval from the institution, organisation and individuals who have either published/produced or held these materials as part of their collections. These materials are meant for educational, research and for non-commercial use only"
dc.place	Delhi	en_US
dc.page	1-43	en_US