| dc.contributor.author | Action Research Associates and Gurgaon Shramik Kendra | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-09-21T05:31:46Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-09-21T05:31:46Z | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/3216 | |
| dc.description | The management contested the employment period as initially she was on probation, and denied paying wages below the minimum standard and charged worker's application as harassment. Annexure A provides wages details which are higher than the minimum wage scale. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | The management rejected the claim as it did not name the company correctly, it did not follow the correct format, and appealed to reject it as malicious. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.subject | Application | en_US |
| dc.subject | Minimum Wages | en_US |
| dc.subject | Harassment | en_US |
| dc.title | Before the Court Modelama's reply to the Claim Application under the Minimum Wages Act 1948 | en_US |
| dc.type | Case Proceeding | en_US |
| dc.description.host | Archives of Indian Labour [V.V. Giri National Labour Institute (VVGNLI) - Association of Indian Labour Historians (AILH)] | en_US |
| dc.description.dis | “All content hosted in this archive has been obtained with prior permission and approval from the institutions, organisations, and individuals who have either published/produced or held these materials as part of their collections. These materials are meant for educational, research and for non-commercial use only.” | en_US |
| dc.page | 9 | en_US |