dc.contributor.author |
Action Research Associates and Gurgaon Shramik Kendra |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-09-21T05:31:46Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-09-21T05:31:46Z |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/3216 |
|
dc.description |
The management contested the employment period as initially she was on probation, and denied paying wages below the minimum standard and charged worker's application as harassment. Annexure A provides wages details which are higher than the minimum wage scale. |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
The management rejected the claim as it did not name the company correctly, it did not follow the correct format, and appealed to reject it as malicious. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Application |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Minimum Wages |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Harassment |
en_US |
dc.title |
Before the Court Modelama's reply to the Claim Application under the Minimum Wages Act 1948 |
en_US |
dc.type |
Case Proceeding |
en_US |
dc.description.host |
Archives of Indian Labour [V.V. Giri National Labour Institute (VVGNLI) - Association of Indian Labour Historians (AILH)] |
en_US |
dc.description.dis |
“All content hosted in this archive has been obtained with prior permission and approval from the institutions, organisations, and individuals who have either published/produced or held these materials as part of their collections. These materials are meant for educational, research and for non-commercial use only.” |
en_US |
dc.page |
9 |
en_US |