DSpace Home
→
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS IN INDIA’S EXPORT GARMENT INDUSTRY: MOBILIZATION AND EMPLOYMENT LAW CASES FROM BANGALORE, GURGAON, TIRUPUR
→
Bangalore
→
Case Documents
→
Case 16: Avery Denison - Termination

Case 16: Avery Denison - Termination

Browse by

Recent Submissions

Minutes of Conciliation Meeting

Alternate Law Forum (2018)

Details of the Dispute.
Statement of Objections from Sri Udyog Enterprise for Garment and Textile Workers Union

Alternate Law Forum (2018-03-01)

The management concluded that the union did not provide any evidence for their claim and it should not be forwarded.
Statement of Objections from Adecco India before the Deputy Labour Commissioner and Conciliation Officer

Alternate Law Forum (2018-02-01)

They argued that they are responsible for supplying workers and Avery Dennison was responsible for fixing contracts. They denied union's demands.
Rejoinder by the Union after Avery Dennison's Reply before the Deputy Labour Commissioner

Alternate Law Forum (2018-01-16)

Union rejected management's objections and demanded that the workers' service should be regularised and issue was discussed in conciliation.
Statement of Objections Filed by Avery Dennison Before Deputy Labour Commissioner and Conciliation Officer

Alternate Law Forum (2017-12-30)

The management demanded that the dispute should be treated as closed in the interest of justice as the workers were contractual employees.
Petition under Section 12 of the IDA before the Deputy Labour Commissioner , Division 2, Bangalore against Avery Dennison by the Garment and Textile Workers Union

Alternate Law Forum (2017-10-28)

Union demanded regularization of employment for the workers at Avery Dennison.

Search DSpace

Advanced Search

Browse

All of DSpace
This Collection
- By Issue Date
- Authors
- Titles
- Subjects

My Account

Discover

RSS Feeds